Huzaima Bukhari<\/p>\n
\u201cMatrilineal succession is the only thing that makes sense as far as I\u2019m concerned, since you always know who the mother is, and the father could be anyone. Most of the royal dynasties of the world didn\u2019t agree with me though, which is why history is filled with idiot kings.\u201d?April White, \u201cMarking Time\u201d
\nWhile learning grammar, we were told that there are nouns or names as we understand. Nouns are further divided into common and proper. Common nouns are generic names\u2013men, women, places, things, cities, countries etcetera\u2013while proper nouns actually help to identify someone or something belonging to these categories such as Ali (man), Asma (woman), Islamabad (city), Laptop (computer) and Pakistan (country). In short, a name distinguishes one from the other and helps point one out of the many. Other than that, it hardly matters whether a person is Tom, Dick or Harry.
\nHowever, we human beings become highly sensitive when it comes to our families and their histories or tracing our lineage as if this would impact our personalities as we are today. Nonetheless, this calls for certain clarifications like unilineal lineages can be matrilineal (through mothers) or patrilineal (through fathers). In earlier times, people would create family trees and pass them on to the next generation. These scrolls were considered valuable to determine whether a person belonged to the \u201chigh gentry\u201d or came from the \u201ccommon class.\u201d These also proved vital in guarding the \u201cpurity\u201d of blood. Even in this modern era, many give preference to lineage rather than an individual\u2019s character. In doing so, many a time, they end up facing adverse consequences but then that is the cost one has to pay for one\u2019s beliefs.
\n\u201cA good character is the best tombstone. Those who loved you and were helped by you will remember you when forget-me-nots have withered. Carve your name on hearts, not on marble.\u201d I wish to add \u201d not on paper either\u201d to this wonderful quote by Charles Spurgeon.
\nHaving evolved on a patriarchal basis, human society has a tradition of tracing patrilineal genealogy. As a result, children are given their father\u2019s name, which a majority of females discard when they append their husband\u2019s name after marriage. Interestingly, the contribution of males in the process of procreation remains to the extent of lending their sperms but the females have to bear the heavy brunt of conception and pregnancy, the pain of delivering and then taking care of the newborn. Still, they neither seem to have any importance nor are deemed fit to have an identity of their own. Another twist to this story is that fatherhood could be doubtful, which can be ascertained today through a DNA test, but there can be no qualms about the veracity of the mother who physically gives birth. With such a heavy load to carry, females are still treated as nothing more than properties owned by males. Their overwhelming existence appears to have no significance. Their desires, sacrifices and pains are meaningless before the acts of their other halves so much so that they are not even allowed to continue with their maiden names once they marry and each time that they divorce and marry another. Why then would they be considered deserving to let their names be carried on by children, who are products of their own wombs?
\nPerhaps, this injustice was taken care of by the last Holy Prophet, Hazrat Muhammad Mustapha (PBUH), whose lineage was determined not by a son but his daughter, Bibi Fatima Zahrah (AS). To this day, Syeds proudly claim their connection with the Prophet (PBUH) through her, yet her descendants fail to appreciate this subtle point; giving sons more importance over daughters. They need to understand that Syeds derive their ancestry from the offsprings of Hazrat Fatima (AS) and Hazrat Ali (AS). Hazrat Ali\u2019s (AS) children from later wives are not Syeds even though he is held in great esteem, probably the most after Holy Prophet (PBUH). This alone speaks volumes about the importance of females, which, unfortunately, has somehow shifted to the back burner even though, according to Islamic teachings, on the Day of Judgement, people will be called out by their mother\u2019s name.
\nIn the West, the concept of giving children their parent\u2019s name, known as \u201cpatronym\u201d goes back several centuries as a symbol of familial fealty to enjoy privileges typical to a particular family that included inheritance and\/or for continuing business owned by it. The sons (generally the first-born) got the name and property. Usually, royalty and upper gentry of the society adopted these measures. Soon afterwards, masses\u2013that as a rule, try to mimic such people\u2013, also began to follow in their footsteps; causing this tradition to gain momentum. With the males enjoying all rights, the females remained deprived in most of the cases. It goes without saying that after World War II and the rise of feminism, this tradition is gradually dying down. The emancipation of women has overcome a lot of outdated customs with male-dominated fields being taken over by females. With rapid changes in family compositions, live-in relationships, adoptions, single-parent tendencies and now rise in lesbian, gay, bisexual and trans (LGBT) communities, it has become all the more important for prompt identification that children should carry their birth mother\u2019s name.
\nEven today, this practice prevails in some places of the world. As per Britannica: \u201cThe Asante, or Ashanti, of Ghana are one of the few matrilineal societies in West Africa in which women inherit status and property directly from their mothers. The Minangkabau of Sumatra, Indonesia, are the world\u2019s largest matrilineal society, in which properties such as land and houses are inherited through female lineage. In Minangkabau society, the man traditionally marries into his wife\u2019s household, and the woman inherits the ancestral home. Matrilineal societies in India are typified by the Khasi in Meghalaya state and by the traditional Nayar in Kerala.\u201d<\/p>\n
The writer, lawyer and author is an Adjunct Faculty (LUMS), member Advisory Board and Senior Visiting Fellow (Pakistan Institute of Development Economics)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Huzaima Bukhari \u201cMatrilineal succession is the only thing that makes sense as far as I\u2019m concerned, since you always know who the mother is, and the father could be anyone. Most of the royal dynasties of the world didn\u2019t agree with me though, which is why history is filled with idiot kings.\u201d?April White, \u201cMarking Time\u201d […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[10],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-225868","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","6":"category-article"},"yoast_head":"\n