LONDON
\nThe High Court has dismissed the judicial review of the decision by the UK Statistics Authority and Chancellor to align the Retail Prices Index (RPI) with the housing cost-based version of the Consumer Prices Index from 2030.
\nThe judicial review into the government\u2019s decision began in June this year after being launched by the trustees of the BT Pension Scheme, Ford Pension Schemes and Marks and Spencer Pension Scheme – pension funds which together represent \u00a383bn of assets and 438,763 members.
\nThe High Court granted permission for the review last December after the government confirmed RPI would be reformed in its comprehensive spending review in November 2020 – changing the longstanding method of calculating inflation to align with the CPIH inflation index from 2030.
\nThe High Court ruled on three main challenges by the schemes – that the UKSA\u2019s RPI was unlawful; that the UKSA failed to take into account the impact of its RPI decision on the holders of RPI index-linked gilts and bonds and persons entitled to index-linked pensions and failed to have regards to the interest of \u201clegacy users\u201d; and that the UKSA failed to consult the public on its RPI decision and to take into account their views when that proposal was at a \u201cformative stage\u201d.
\nThe schemes also claimed the Chancellor failed to consult with legacy users on the issue of compensation and to take into account properly their representations in this area. The court rejected all of these challenges in a ruling by Mr Justice Holgate on September 01.
\nThe schemes said they were \u201cdisappointed\u201d with yesterday\u2019s ruling – noting the decision means investors who bought index-linked gilts \u201cin good faith\u201d could now face losses of as much as \u00a3100bn.
\nThe schemes said the judgment also means that the government is not required to pay compensation as a result of the indexation change. Responding to the judgment, a spokesperson for the schemes said: \u201cWe are disappointed that the UKSA has been allowed to align the RPI with CPIH from 2030 without proper consultation and consideration of the impact such a decision will have on schemes holding RPI index-linked bonds and the retirement incomes of their members.
\n\u201cMany investors, including pension funds, bought index-linked gilts in good faith and now face losses of \u00a390 to \u00a3100bn.\u201d
\nThe spokesperson added: \u201cThis decision will leave millions of pensioners in defined benefit schemes with RPI linked benefits poorer through no fault of their own and facing substantial decreases in their year-on-year income. Women will be particularly impacted since they live longer and retire earlier.\u201d
\nThe schemes said they are now considering the judgment, including whether to seek permission to appeal the judgment.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
LONDON The High Court has dismissed the judicial review of the decision by the UK Statistics Authority and Chancellor to align the Retail Prices Index (RPI) with the housing cost-based version of the Consumer Prices Index from 2030. The judicial review into the government\u2019s decision began in June this year after being launched by the […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":281185,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-281173","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-world"},"yoast_head":"\n