Pakistan\u2019s belated decision to skip the summit for democracy is a significant move that has garnered mixed reaction from various quarters. While some argue that the country\u2019s decision is a wise one, others criticize it for sending the wrong message to the international community.
\nThe second edition of the virtual summit, hosted by the United States, aims to bring together leaders from around the world to discuss issues related to democracy, including governance, human rights and the rule of law.
\nChina and Turkiye are conspicuous for not having been invited to the summit.
\nThe issue of Pakistan\u2019s participation in the summit remained under discussion for quite some time, particularly because it could potentially upset its \u201call-weather friend\u201d China. The decision had been a challenging one, with Pakistan weighing the benefits of participation against the potential risks to its diplomatic relationships in the region and across the world.
\nIt\u2019s very important for Pakistan at this stage to focus on the fallout of growing US-China rivalry, especially within the already fraught South Asian security environment where US has diverted its investment to India only to counter-balance China.
\nHistorically, Pakistan has played very critical role in maintain the balance of power in the region. It should play a bridging role to help ease tensions between the US and China.
\nOn the one hand, Pakistan has been facing numerous challenges both domestically and internationally, including economic challenges, security threats and strained relations with its neighbors. In this context, Pakistan\u2019s decision to skip the summit for democracy may be seen as a pragmatic move to focus on domestic priorities.
\nFurthermore, Pakistan\u2019s decision may be seen as an attempt to distance itself from the Western-led democracies, which it believes have a history of interfering in its internal affairs. Pakistan\u2019s leaders have long argued that the country\u2019s democratic process should be allowed to evolve at its own pace, and that the West should not impose its own standards and values on the country.
\nOn the other hand, critics argue that Pakistan\u2019s decision to skip the summit for democracy sends the wrong message to the international community. Democracy is a core value that is cherished by many countries around the world, and Pakistan\u2019s decision not to participate in the summit which seeks to promote democracy could be interpreted as a lack of commitment to democratic values.
\nPakistan\u2019s decision could be seen as a missed opportunity to engage with other countries and share its own experiences with democracy. By skipping the summit, Pakistan has missed an opportunity to showcase its democratic achievements, such as holding regular elections and allowing freedom of the press.
\nPakistan\u2019s decision to skip the summit underscores the need for the international community to continue to engage with Pakistan and other countries that are struggling with these issues, and work towards building a more democratic and equitable world.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Pakistan\u2019s belated decision to skip the summit for democracy is a significant move that has garnered mixed reaction from various quarters. While some argue that the country\u2019s decision is a wise one, others criticize it for sending the wrong message to the international community. The second edition of the virtual summit, hosted by the United […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[8],"tags":[12434],"class_list":{"0":"post-322427","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","6":"category-editorial","7":"tag-mixed-reaction"},"yoast_head":"\n