ISLAMABAD
\nPresident Dr Arif Alvi has directed the National University of Science and Technology (NUST) to refund an amount of $11,270 as it committed maladministration by unjustly confiscating the admission dues of a student 15 years ago who vacated the seat at the initial stages and joined another university.
\nHe said that NUST, having been established\/controlled by the Federal Government, fell under the definition of \u201cAgency\u201d of the Government, was not a private commercial entity but a service provider in the public sector, and confiscating the dues of a student was tantamount to exploitation and malpractice.
\nThe President gave these directions in a 15-year-old matter, referred to him in 2022. As per details, a student was admitted to MBBS on the Foreign SAT basis session 2007 in NUST and his father (the complainant) deposited the admission fee of $11,420. The complainant\u2019s son got admission in another medical university of Pakistan and he applied to NUST for a refund. NUST refused his request on the basis of its Refund Policy.
\nFeeling aggrieved, the complainant approached Wafaqi Mohtasib in 2008, which directed NUST to refund the amount. NUST, then, filed a representation which was rejected on the ground that NUST did not explain how its policy was lawful and it failed to show that it suffered any financial loss due to the student\u2019s decision to join another university.
\nHence, the decision of NUST to retain the fee was termed as unjustified. NUST then filed a writ petition in Islamabad High Court in 2015 which asked the Mohtasib to pass a reasoned order on the questions that whether any maladministration was committed by NUST and that it was an \u201cAgency\u201d of the Government. Subsequently, the matter was remanded to the President.
\nThe President in his decision said that since the \u201cprovisional admission\u201d offered to the student could not be converted into final admission and another student was admitted by NUST on the seat vacated by him, therefore, NUST charged double dues against one seat which, prima facie, was tantamount to exploitation and malpractice.
\nHe said that the act of declining a refund in the present case amounted to \u201cforfeiture and confiscation\u201d which was not permissible except backed by the law. He said that although the prospectus of the University had stated that tuition fees and Development Fund would not be refunded to applicants, the admission was neither final nor matured and NUST faced no financial loss in the instant case, and therefore, the student deserved to get a refund of his dues.
\nThe President stated that any provision of the Prospectus of NUST could not travel beyond the limit prescribed by the law and the Policy or Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) cannot overrule the provisions of the Constitution of Pakistan i.e., in Articles 3 and 4 regarding the elimination of exploitation and rights of individuals.
\nHe added that since NUST had committed maladministration, therefore, it was advised to refund all the dues to the student by deducting only the admission fee of $150 as NUST had initiated some process which involved expenses which were liable to be deducted.
\nIt was further observed that NUST was established under the Act of the Parliament namely \u201cthe National University of Science and Technology Act, 1997\u201d having the President of Pakistan as Patron-in-Chief under Section 6 and the Prime Minister of Pakistan as Chancellor under Section 8 of NUST Act, 1997, and that having been established\/controlled by the Federal Government, and thus, NUST fell under the definition of \u201cAgency\u201d as defined in Article 2(1) of the Establishment of the Office of Wafaqi Mohtasib (Ombudsman) Order, 1983.
\nThe President, therefore, directed NUST to pay the confiscated amount while only deducting $150 out of the total deposited amount of $11,420.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
ISLAMABAD President Dr Arif Alvi has directed the National University of Science and Technology (NUST) to refund an amount of $11,270 as it committed maladministration by unjustly confiscating the admission dues of a student 15 years ago who vacated the seat at the initial stages and joined another university. He said that NUST, having been […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":329073,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-330793","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-top-news"},"yoast_head":"\n