Mohammad Jamil<\/p>\n
Turkey\u2019s relations with the US were already strained due to latter\u2019s support for the Syrian Kurdish militia groups known as the People\u2019s Protection Units (YPG), which are closely linked to the Kurdistan Workers\u2019 Party (PKK). Turkey views the YPG as terrorists, and has many a time asked America to stop pampering and supporting them, but the US administration refuses to do so. After the July 15 coup, the Turkish government alleged that the coup was planned in the US by Fatehullah Gulen, calling him a CIA asset, and that Incirlik NATO\u2019s airbase in Turkey was used for refuelling the rebels\u2019 planes midair.
\nNow Turkey demands extradition of Gulen, which the US simply won\u2019t do. In this backdrop, the Turkish government is trying to woo the Russian Federation showing its card of alternative policy options. And one day, the US could lose an old and staunch ally in the Middle East and West Asia.
\nThough the Justice and Development Party (AKP) has Islamist roots, its members show remarkable tolerance to other religions and those having different points of view. It had taken far-reaching reforms that stabilised the economy to ensure that Turkey\u2019s membership talks with the European Union (EU) continued. However, some European countries do not wish to see Turkey in EU\u2019s fold although they claim to be the continent of diverse people, races and religions united by ideas and ideals. Nevertheless, the EU members always found some excuse to stall the talks for Turkey\u2019s membership.
\nIn December 2006, some EU members expressed indignation over Turkey\u2019s refusal to use its ports for the Greek Cypriot traffic. They were of the view that Turkey was under a legal obligation to treat all EU countries equally, but Turkey demanded that the EU must lift its trade embargo on Turkey\u2019s northern Cyprus.
\nBut there is something more to it. Berlin and Paris often expressed apprehensions that Turkey\u2019s entry would dilute the bloc\u2019s Christian identity. But now it looks like that the chapter of Turkey\u2019s entry in the EU is closed, especially after Erdogan\u2019s statement that \u201cTurkey is not dying for EU membership.\u201d As a matter of fact, the formal talks initiated in October 2005 about Turkey\u2019s membership of the EU had already foundered. Some member countries were of the view that Turkey was a poor country as compared to other countries of the EU, while others highlighted its cultural differences with the rest of Europe. Nevertheless, Turkey had introduced economic, social and political reforms, taken steps to liberalise its economy, and achieved more than eight percent economic growth in 2007, which was more than any other member-country of the EU.
\nIndeed, Turkey is the founder member of NATO. After Britain, Turkey\u2019s army is second biggest in NATO, and has played a commendable role as its strong arm. The Incirlik Airbase in southeast Turkey, houses NATO\u2019s largest nuclear weapons storage facility.
\nThe question arises that if Turkey can be a part of alliance for the security of Europe why not in economic, social and other spheres. There is also a perception that EU members do not wish to have a Muslim country in EU\u2019s fold. Though they pretend to be broadminded, enlightened and tolerant of other religions, but in fact they are not, which Turkey now understands. Of course, it is too premature to rush to judgment that Turkey would withdraw from NATO, as both the US and Turkey see their interests best served by sticking together. However, the relations between Turkey and the US are at the lowest ebb after the last coup.
\nThe US is likely to lose another old ally in this region. Pakistan has had a chequered history of relations with the US. Pakistan claims that it has been sincere with the US, and during 1950s to 1980s had discharged its obligations under the defence pacts signed or understanding reached with the US and the west. But every time the so-called allies achieved their objectives, they ditched Pakistan.
\nThe US entered into a civil nuclear agreement with India, but refused to sign a similar agreement with Pakistan. America\u2019s pressure on Pakistan to \u201cdo more\u201d irks Pakistan\u2019s civil and military leadership. However, coercive policies of the US could lead to loss of strategic allies in the region. If Turkey has responded to the coercive tactics of the White House by showing an inclination to join the Eurasian bloc, other states in the region could follow suit.
\nThat point aside, Pakistan has always wished to maintain long-term, multi-faceted and durable strategic ties with the US for the realisation of shared objectives. However, Pakistan had taken the position that mutual respect and co-operation at military, intelligence and diplomatic levels should be the hallmark of relations between the two countries. Members of the US administration and US generals have been pushing Pakistan to do more, despite the fact that Pakistan has lost more than 50,000 people and 5,000 security personnel since joining the war on terror. Yet, they often say that Pakistan must be sensitive to US security interests. The question is if Pakistan has not been doing that, what has it been doing since the US invasion of Afghanistan, and that too even to the detriment of its own national interests? In 1960, Pakistan had a close brush of being bombed back into the Stone Age by the enraged Soviet Union after it downed a U-2 spy plane.
\nIn the arena are arrayed the EU and the US against Russia, which has already taken the Crimean peninsula, and is now eyeing the Russian speaking eastern Ukraine, where the natives agitated for joining the customs union with Russia. China has a dispute over islands in the South China Sea with west\u2019s allies, but in July 2016, the Permanent Court of Arbitration rejected China\u2019s claim. \u201cThe landmark arbitration ruling in July, which is binding, helped clarify maritime rights in the region,\u201d President Barack Obama told a summit of Asian leaders in Laos on Thursday. Beijing has vowed to ignore the verdict. Both China and Russia appear to have a desire to limit American power. And one can infer from the changing political landscape that the world is moving towards a new cold war and a multipolar world.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Mohammad Jamil Turkey\u2019s relations with the US were already strained due to latter\u2019s support for the Syrian Kurdish militia groups known as the People\u2019s Protection Units (YPG), which are closely linked to the Kurdistan Workers\u2019 Party (PKK). Turkey views the YPG as terrorists, and has many a time asked America to stop pampering and supporting […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[10],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3427","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","category-article"],"yoast_head":"\n