The federal government on Friday informed the Supreme Court that it has formed a \u201cspecial fact-finding committee\u201d to ensure compliance with the top court\u2019s verdict on the 2017 sit-in by the Tehreek-i-Labbaik Pakistan (TLP) at Islamabad\u2019s Faizabad.<\/p>\n
Attorney-General for Pakistan Mansoor Usman Awan conveyed this development through a three-page report submitted to the court.<\/p>\n
A three-member bench \u2014 including Chief Justice of Pakistan Qazi Faez Isa, Justice Aminuddin Khan and Justice Athar Minallah \u2014 had on Sep 28 heard a set of review petitions challenging the apex court\u2019s verdict.<\/p>\n
However, during the hearing, the defence ministry through the federal government, the PTI and Ijazul Haq \u2014 son of former military dictator Ziaul Haq \u2014 had joined the Intelligence Bureau and the Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority (Pemra) to withdraw their pleas, prompting the CJP to ask \u201cwhy is everyone so afraid to speak the truth\u201d.<\/p>\n
Subsequently, the top court had adjourned the hearing till November 1 and directed the respondents\u2019 counsels to submit a written response by October 27.<\/p>\n
Authored by Justice Qazi Faez Isa years before he took oath as the CJP, the searing judgement had instructed the defence ministry and the tri-services chiefs to penalise personnel under their command who were found to have violated their oath.<\/p>\n
It had also directed the federal government to monitor those advocating hate, extremism and terrorism and prosecute them in accordance with the law.<\/p>\n
Adverse observations were also made against several government departments for causing inconvenience to the public as the 20-day sit-in paralysed life in both Islamabad and Rawalpindi.<\/p>\n
Pleas were subsequently moved against the verdict by the Ministry of Defence, the IB, the PTI, Pemra, the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP), the Mutta\u00adhida Qaumi Movement (MQM), Rashid and Ijazul Haq.<\/p>\n
In the latest development today, the AGP submitted a report informing the court that the government has established a fact-finding committee \u201cto ensure directions contained in Feb 6, 2019 judgment\u201d.<\/p>\n
He said the three-member committee consisted of the Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) director and additional secretaries from the ministries of Defence and Interior.<\/p>\n
According to the government, the committee has been entrusted with the responsibility of conducting an inquiry and determining accountability as outlined in the terms of reference (TORs).<\/p>\n
The TORs encompass the collection, examination, and review of all pertinent documents, records, and evidence. The committee is also mandated to record statements from relevant witnesses, assess the situation in compliance with applicable laws, regulations, and policies, and identify the roles played by all individuals involved in the handling of the matter.<\/p>\n
The committee is also tasked with submitting a comprehensive report, inclusive of recommendations.<\/p>\n
The report further mentioned that the committee convened its inaugural meeting on October 26 in accordance with the TORs.<\/p>\n
\u201cThe committee shall furnish a fact-finding report to the Ministry of Defence by Nov 1. In the event, further time is required for furnishing of the report, the committee will seek extension from the Ministry of Defence,\u201d the report added.<\/p>\n
It also requested: \u201cThe instant application may be granted and the petitioner upon completion of the fact-finding report be permitted, to submit the same before this court.\u201d<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
The federal government on Friday informed the Supreme Court that it has formed a \u201cspecial fact-finding committee\u201d to ensure compliance with the top court\u2019s verdict on the 2017 sit-in by the Tehreek-i-Labbaik Pakistan (TLP) at Islamabad\u2019s Faizabad. Attorney-General for Pakistan Mansoor Usman Awan conveyed this development through a three-page report submitted to the court. A […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":326693,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[292],"class_list":{"0":"post-364420","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-national","8":"tag-supreme-court"},"yoast_head":"\n