Islamabad
\nChief Justice of Pakistan (CJP) Qaiz Faez Isa on Thursday stated that debarring someone from office for life was the same as condemning them for life.
\n\u201cIf you debar someone for life, you condemn that person for life. There is no redemption or forgiveness which the Samiullah Baloch [decision] also touches upon but does not attend to it at all,\u201d he remarked as the Supreme Court heard a set of petitions seeking to determine whether the disqualification period for a lawmaker was for five years or a lifetime.
\nA seven-member larger bench, headed by the CJP and comprising Justice Justice Syed Mansoor Ali Shah, Justice Yahya Afridi, Justice Aminuddin Khan, Justice Jamal Khan Mandokhail, Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar and Justice Musarrat Hilali, conducted the six hour-long marathon proceedings that were broadcast live of the apex court\u2019s website.
\nThe hearing was adjourned till 9am tomorrow (Friday).
\nAs the February 8 general elections approach, the apex court is seeking to determine once and for all the raging debate on whether aspirants disqualified under Article 62(1)(f) of the Constitution could contest polls in light of the amendments in the Elections Act 2017.
\nThe law, which sets the precondition for a member of parliament to be \u201csadiq and ameen\u201d (honest and righteous), is the same provision under which former prime minister Nawaz Sharif and Istehkam-i-Pakistan Party Chairman Jahangir Tareen were disqualified.
\nThe legal impasse arose in view of a 2018 SC judgment in the Samiullah Baloch case, when the apex court ruled that disqualification handed down under Article 62(1)(f) was supposed to be \u201cpermanent\u201d. The verdict was issued by former chief justice Mian Saqib Nisar, Justice Sheikh Azmat Saeed, ex-CJP Umar Ata Bandial, Justice Ahsan and Justice Sajjad Ali Shah.
\nHowever, in June 2023, an amendment was brought in the Elections Act 2017, specifying that the period of the electoral disqualification will be for five years, not for life.
\nThe dilemma cropped up in the top court last month during an electoral disqualification dispute moved by Sardar Mir Badshah Khan Qaisarani, who had filed nomination papers to contest the 2008 and 2018 elections but was disqualification for producing a fake graduation degree.
\nHis appeal is still pending before the Lahore High Court.
\nDelving deep into the matter of disqualification at the previous hearing, the CJP had questioned why two similarly worded provisions of the Constitu\u00adtion provided different punishments to parliamentarians for the same offence.
\nHe had compared Art\u00adicle 62(1)(f) and Article 63(1)(g) and said the former entrailed a lifetime ban whereas the latter prescribed a five-year ban from parliament.
\nThe court had also appointed senior counsel Faisal Siddiqui, Uzair Karamat Bhandari, and legal adviser Reema Omar as amici to assist the court, expressing its intention to wrap up the case proceedings by Jan 11 as it may create \u201cconfusion\u201d for returning officers.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Islamabad Chief Justice of Pakistan (CJP) Qaiz Faez Isa on Thursday stated that debarring someone from office for life was the same as condemning them for life. \u201cIf you debar someone for life, you condemn that person for life. There is no redemption or forgiveness which the Samiullah Baloch [decision] also touches upon but does […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":378718,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-378714","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-top-news"},"yoast_head":"\n