It would not be entirely true to say that Iraq has never really seen any stability since the European mandate gobbled up what was left of the Ottoman writ over the area after the first world war. As recently as the time of Saddam Hussein\u2019s predecessor at the presidency, Ahmed Hassan al-Bakr (1968-79), most commentators agree that the country was indeed blossoming after decades of intrigue, corruption and coups. Bakr, with young cousin Saddam as his deputy, instituted land reforms, redistributed wealth, built highways and schools, and inched closer all the time to that quintessential Arab socialist model that the Ba\u2019ath Party was supposed to be all about.
\nBut then American and British intelligence agencies fed Saddam\u2019s giant ego with visions of grandeur and conquest \u2013 we know that for sure because much of CIA records from the time have now been declassified \u2013 and triggered not just an unfortunate palace coup in Baghdad but also a senseless eight-year war with Iran that would take millions of lives on either side and still end in stalemate. Since then, though, it\u2019s pretty much been all downhill. First there was the financial drain from the disastrous war, then Saddam\u2019s own stranglehold on society, then he took the bait and wrongly attacked Kuwait (even though, it turned out, the latter was really stealing Iraqi oil), and then the two American wars delivering the kiss of death to the Ba\u2019ath party and everything it had erected.
\nYet, to state the obvious, the post-invasion\/\u2019liberation\u2019 period has been worse in every possible way. If Saddam\u2019s corruption and brutality and then the American wars weren\u2019t bad enough, ordinary Iraqis then had to live with increasing sectarianism and then the terrible, tragic reality of the Islamic State, especially ISIS rule stretching from Mosul all the way to the Syrian border.
\nEven now, when the so-called caliphate has been broken, oil revenues are steady and timely annual rains helped the government cut down on power shortages this year, the average Iraqi youth is out on the streets once again, wishing an end to corruption, violence and, above all, the government of Prime Minister Adel Abdul-Mahdi. And, interestingly, much of the non-Arab press \u2013 including touching editorials in Pakistani dailies \u2013 is wrong to put a sectarian touch to the uprising. The bulk of the unrest comes from the Shi\u2019a majority south, which is rising against the Shi\u2019a government in Baghdad, even chanting slogans against Iranian influence, which no doubt rose as the war with ISIS intensified. The government, for its part, took all the usual steps that such circumstances require in the third world \u2013 offering more jobs, promising a better future, and killing a hundred people and injuring thousands more just for good measure. Yet, practically speaking, there\u2019s very little, including the fall of the government and end to all Iranian influence, that can do much about highest inflation in decades and unemployment hovering at around 25 pc, which has actually go the youth so angry. Things, therefore, are likely to get worse before they get any better.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
It would not be entirely true to say that Iraq has never really seen any stability since the European mandate gobbled up what was left of the Ottoman writ over the area after the first world war. As recently as the time of Saddam Hussein\u2019s predecessor at the presidency, Ahmed Hassan al-Bakr (1968-79), most commentators […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[10],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-86722","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","category-article"],"yoast_head":"\n