Home Article Peace in the Periphery

Peace in the Periphery

0
64

Dr Talat Shabbir

Pakistan is geographically complex and strategically consequential, as it is situated at the intersection of South Asia, Central Asia and the Middle East and shares borders with India, Afghanistan, Iran and China. This geographical location offers enormous possibilities for trade, connectivity and regional influence, but it also exposes the country to conflict, terrorism, political instability and geopolitical competition. Peace beyond its borders is not just a luxury of foreign policy, it is a precondition for economic progress and internal stability.
The eastern frontier with India remains Pakistan’s most consequential strategic challenge, shaped by a deeply painful and enduring historical legacy. Seven decades of conflict and the Kashmir dispute have created a relationship in which even minor incident can potentially trigger escalation to a dangerous extent. What is perhaps required is a sustained effort to manage differences without allowing them to become sources of conflict. Military-to-military communication, existing confidence-building mechanisms and arrangements to prevent accidental escalation should, therefore, be strengthened.
Afghanistan’s instability has serious implications for Pakistan because of cross-border communities, refugee movements, trade routes and security linkages. Pakistan cannot afford an insecure western frontier while simultaneously seeking regional connectivity. Islamabad’s Afghan policy should consequently combine firmness with sustained engagement. Pakistan must clearly insist that Afghan territory cannot be used for attacks against Pakistan, while maintaining channels for dialogue with Kabul. Border security, intelligence cooperation and coordinated action against militant networks should be strengthened for peace on western border. At the same time, legitimate trade, transit and movement may be facilitated through regulated and effective border systems.
Iran represents another important component of Pakistan’s peripheral peace and economic interests. The two countries share a long border, historical connections and potential for trade, energy cooperation and border development. Pakistan and Iran should establish stronger mechanisms for permanent border coordination, intelligence sharing and rapid communication during security incidents. Legal border trade should be expanded and formalised, reducing the space for smuggling and criminal networks. Joint development initiatives in border areas could have potential to provide employment and economic opportunity while strengthening confidence between the two states.
The wider security environment also requires Pakistan to rethink its approach to terrorism. Contemporary militant organisations are not dependent solely on conventional sanctuaries. They exploit digital platforms, informal financial channels, local grievances and transnational networks. Pakistan needs stronger intelligence-led policing, financial surveillance, cyber capabilities, border technology, judicial capacity and mechanisms for preventing radicalisation. At the same time, local communities must become partners in security initiatives leading to peace and stability.
Development gaps, unemployment, inadequate infrastructure and weak access to public services deepen alienation and create opportunities for violent and criminal groups to operate. Investment in Balochistan, the former tribal districts and other border communities should therefore be regarded as an element of national security. Roads, schools, hospitals, digital connectivity, vocational training and legitimate employment will surely enhance people’s stake in peace.
Regional trade corridors cannot function efficiently when borders remain vulnerable to conflict or sudden closure. CPEC, Gwadar, connectivity with Central Asia and Pakistan’s ambition to become a regional trade and transit hub all depend upon a stable surrounding environment. Pakistan should therefore adopt a coherent “peace through strength, stability through engagement and prosperity through connectivity” strategy. Pakistan should, therefore, initiate measures that can help bring lasting peace in the region. First, credible deterrence must be maintained, but military capability should be complemented by diplomatic efforts. Second, Pakistan should institutionalise regular diplomatic and security dialogues with India, Afghanistan and Iran so that communication does not disappear during crises. Third, border management should be modernised through biometric systems, surveillance technology, coordinated crossings and intelligence-sharing arrangements.History
Fourth, economic diplomacy should become a central pillar of Pakistan’s neighbourhood policy. Pakistan should identify cross-border trade opportunities, simplify legitimate commercial procedures and pursue mutually beneficial energy and transport projects. Fifth, development programmes in frontier regions should be linked to measurable improvements in employment, education, infrastructure and state services. Finally, Pakistan should strengthen domestic institutions so that foreign and security policy is supported by economic resilience, effective governance and social cohesion.
The fundamental lesson is clear. Pakistan cannot secure its future by looking inward only. Its national security, economic prospects and regional influence are inseparable from the conditions prevailing on its periphery. The goal may not be an ideal neighbourhood without conflicts and disputes.