Touqeer Kharal
The important question of what will happen after Imran Khan is what happened to Imran Khan? Did Imran Khan come to power with the catchy slogans that changed? In the three-and-a-half-year reign, was there even a single day of continuity in this struggle that had been going on for twenty-two years? In the beginning, like the previous governments, they shouted that the treasury is empty and tried to bring the country towards stability by taking loans from neighboring and long-time friendly countries. That is, what all the democratic rulers have been doing
As long as he got time to rule, he could not do anything, so he continued to challenge the opposition. People were also happy. The opposition also united, which had neither a single slogan nor a single flag, but realizing the danger of their existence, they united against Imran Khan alone. When Khan couldn’t walk alone, couldn’t do what he was determined to do, then what happened happened. The former prime minister himself revealed that someone else was running my government. That is, Khan Sahib was helpless. There was no power. The slogan of struggle, ideology and change on one side, helplessness during the regime on one side.
That is, Imran Khan is not the name of any ideology. As soon as the situation took a turn, he got the government by raising the slogan of change. If he gets the government, he will spread spirituality. There are lessons of patience and gratitude. When he visited Iran, he announced to bring a revolution like Iran, then he turned towards China. So they will bring a system like China. Examining the mentality of the people of Pakistan, the slogan of the Islamic welfare state started echoing. That is, the ideology is not specific, but launch your narrative in every case and put the people behind the light of the truck. The government has ended, it is an American conspiracy. If the Long March has started, Jihad is taking place.
Without a single ideology, the journey of change is going on with attractive slogans, which has no destination or goal. He is not an ideological person. He took the U-turn where it was difficult to see. God bless you. If the name of a religious scholar of Lahore comes to your mind while reading all this, then it is my fault. Every new ideological person is like that. Violent is “Reject the first ones, then when you step in, it’s like the boss’s will.”
Khan Sahib was speaking well. If compared to other politicians, the only difference in Khan Sahib’s politics is that the rest of the politicians did corruption and were notorious. Imran Khan had no such stain. The desecrators got their own clothes dirty. Khan’s face was cleared, but Khan Sahib is now so disappointed with the justice system that he repeatedly gives the same message to the public that if there is no arbitrary FIR after the attack on me, then how will you get justice? ? That is, Khan Sahib now wants to please the people with a new slogan. So it has been proved that Imran Khan has no ideology. The question is what will happen after Imran Khan? It won’t matter.
Yes, the public will lose a man who tried to impose his narrative with long speeches, who knew how to sell the public reaction by creating his narrative, who could play well like a great player, but could only play to do something. He was unable to play sports. What will be the difference? There is nothing. The people need a person in every era who will lament their poverty and interpret their feelings. If Imran Khan goes, another person will come who will help them. He will perform well. Imran Khan after Bhutto Shaheed, someone else after Imran Khan.
One of the reasons for the concern of the people’s party is that until now their leader was an anti-establishment leader, even though Bhutto was resurrected. With apologies to the workers, Bhutto is now “dead”. Now give it a good burial. He will surely live in the pages of history and in the hearts of a few people until he lives. If Bhutto was considered to be alive to anti-establishment, the People’s Party would have stood with the anti-establishment movement in every democratic era.
This objection is unfounded that how Imran Khan became anti-establishment, he was first with the army and Mr. Bhutto Shaheed was also with him first. The anti-establishment face does not stand out. After rejection, Tehreek-e-Insaf workers will also get tired of chanting slogans of Zinda Hai Imran Khan Zinda Hai.
