Hamza Kamal
To tariff, or not to tariff? This is what policymakers throughout the world have been dealing with since President Trump’s so-called Liberation Day. Only time will tell whether this decision is a step in the right direction. However, one can conclude that this marks the end of globalization as we know it.
The United States of America’s role as an anchor for globalization is quickly coming to an end, with other economies such as China and India rapidly growing and challenging the world order through their own ideologies. This has prompted the United States of America to turn inward, become defensive, and navigate a newly multipolar world. As a result, it is past time for nations around the world to start thinking about themselves and becoming self-sufficient, rather than focusing on the codependent world that we are so accustomed to.
In addition to the protechamztionist policies of President Trump, another major reason for a retreat from globalization is a realization among countries of the power that the United States has over certain systems, such as the financial SWIFT system. This was apparent from the Russian-Ukrainian conflict when the West was able to unilaterally exclude Russia from its SWIFT system and block its assets and then use those assets to fuel the war. Despite what side you are on in the war, this fact raises caution that this could happen to any nation and that it is absolutely necessary for every country to be self-reliant if something of this sort happens to them.
Another example occurred recently, when President Trump withdrew military support from Ukraine, prompting the United Kingdom and other European countries to increase their defense budgets in order to become militarily self-sufficient in the future.
In addition to recent US policy changes, the coronavirus pandemic exposed supply chain vulnerabilities, further impeding globalization. The disruptions, increases in costs, and shortages prompted countries to reconsider their reliance on international suppliers for critical items. This has resulted in increased local production and stockpiling to reduce the risk of future crises.
Another impediment to globalization is the growing importance of nations controlling the flow of data within their borders, which has resulted in multinational corporations being more regulated and scrutinized. This impedes the internet’s borderless nature. One example is TikTok, which has been targeted by multiple governments with potential bans and ownership restrictions due to worries about how user data is handled under Chinese ownership. In a similar case, Huawei has been barred from participating in 5G network development in countries like the U.S. and parts of Europe, driven by national security concerns over possible surveillance.
One of the most significant barriers to globalization is a shift in public opinion among citizens of countries who regard regulated but fluid borders negatively. Brexit exemplifies this, as British citizens left the European Union in order to feel more in control of their own country. They believed that immigrants were taking their jobs and negatively impacting their way of life. This type of stance can also be seen in the sentiment of Americans and others around the world as more nationalistic leaders are elected.
The world is undergoing a period of significant upheaval, beginning with the COVID-19 pandemic and continuing with a growing trend of nationalism and self-reliance among nations. Western countries are increasingly turning inward, tightening borders and prioritizing domestic interests. At the same time, rising powers such as China and India are taking on more prominent roles in shaping global dynamics. These developments suggest a shift toward a more multipolar world, where U.S. dominance is no longer a given.
The writer is a business analyst and has graduated from LUMS.
Courtesy
